on the autonomy of we People,
in a well-balanced Federal, Democratic and as well Republican society.
today, on 22nd February 2o22, radio and tv stations around the globe are reporting that russian troops have occupied a small Region in East Ukraine that was called the Donbass.
Two cities, Doneszk and Luhansk, with a population of about 1.000.000 people and a bit more than 400.000 people, respectively, have been accepted by the Russian Government as independent, autonomous regions in the world, with a status of, or similar to, a small independent Nation.
Furthermore, it was told that no further Territory of Ukraine or other countries was occupied by Russian Troops. So as it seems, to the best of my knowledge, they basically have decided to defend the autonomy of their own Landsmen, who had settled there in the decades before today, in a majority of about 75% of Russian population, towards a minority of about 25% of Ukraine population.
This incident, as harmful as it sounds, makes it clear that the Russian Government has decided to invest no more hope in the autonomy status within Ukraine, as it was proposed in the Minsk agreement.
According to the Principles of International Public State Law, a country‘s actions have to be measured by the country‘s constitution. This follows from the assumption of innocence (in dubio pro reo), in combination with the existance of any natural person(s) in that state. We could question if a public state exists, in Theory, but as soon as the existance of that Public State is defended by a natural person, signing that to you personally (an alternative common worldwide habit is to claim your belonging to your Public State by showing your Passport), the existance of that Public State is now properly defended by your own Personal Integrity, Trustworthyness, and Credibility, through (Pacta sunt Servanda).Continue reading “on the autonomy of we people.”