This Article is much about the Power of Words. Because Words create thoughts, words can create fear, hate, distrust, as well as a good mood creates love, to believe again in justice, fairness, in chances, in good and fair money for the worker’s job, and no dime for the lazy ones in court. Same rights for all, or no justice was found, anymore.
A few simple, well-known examples?
Huawei. for Jahwe. Wu’han. for Woman. Freedom. and Equality. for Justice. and Fear.
Because with every good, righteous person, in Politics, there‘s gonna be some loser, as well.
es beantragt ordnungsgemäßer Teilhaber Nr. 43×84 folgende Beschlussfassung:
Eröffnung eines Antragsportals innerhalb der nachgenannten Website binnen 14 Tagen ab der nächsten ordentlichen Vorstandssitzung des Bundesvorstands der Piratenpartei Deutschland, so dass den Menschen in gleicher Form das Recht zu Teil werde, ihre Positionen für ein besseres Land transparent und chancengerecht darzustellen, oder ggf. neu einzureichen.
The 21st century worldwide growth of forest simulation is much about thinking about the consequences of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Thinking over Time.
This article was formerly published as The 21st century worldwide growth of Forest product.
However, we have decided for smaller, more reasonable official product publications. The reasoning shall be relatively short there, and further thoughts and personal opinions around the topic shall be written in Logbook Articles. So that people downloading our software can follow and develop their own thoughts, and are not mislead too far by mine, on the product page.
So from 2020, in the Logbook of Dynamic Applications, we shall concern ourselves with Articles, Short Stories, Essays and Noteworthy Thoughts around Values and Targets, as well around Society, Politics, Democracy, Law and Order, Targets in Life, and finally, Sustainable Thinking.
As that’s what we learn from working with, working on Dynamic Applications.
we define a conditionless, financiable Universal European Basic Income.
it may sound impossible, but neither it is impossible, nor does it have to be fictional, ridiculous, unrealistic, oder have to be a neo-communist approach. Just requires a bit of modesty, good-will, and a smart approach where we trade, we balance nature’s benefit against poverty and neglecting, selfish behavior of the super posh and shiny super rich.
Let’s calculate a simple, financiably viable UBI (BGE) of 400 Euro/month for the 4-person family.
This is a very interesting article by Wang Zhao about fundamental blocks of System Dynamics archetypes in elaborated detail, posted by @YoungModeler.
For everyone new to the topic, a simple overview of the basic feedback loops that are common to Business Model Generation as well can be found on Wikipedia’s article about System Archetypes. As well, the basic picture of those interacting Problems-and-Success Models can be found within each Dynamic Application.
Building World Models, altogether. A great topic to discuss.
I found that management picutre on German Wikipedia, translated the picture to English, called it “Balanced Scorecard – Management”, and added that picture to the top right icons in Dynamic Applications. Finally, i’ve uploaded it to the english article on System Archetypes at Wikipedia. Where it resides until today.
How could such archetypes or “building blocks” be incorporated with Dynamic Applications? – your suggestions are highly appreciated.
For everyone interested in more detailed building blocks, see PDF Attachment at the bottom of the article by @YoungModeler, reblogged below.
By Wang Zhao
Located in Lisbon, Portugal
European Master in System Dynamics candidate 2017-2019
Modellers face a problem: Too few of their models ever get reused. Meanwhile, many projects start by building a new model from scratch requiring plenty of research to conceptualize the model structure. If we see these two aspects from the perspective of ‘supply’ and ‘demand’, is there any ‘mismatch’ in between that hinders models from reuse? If so, what could be the reason?