six billion.
not even having a laptop our pc.
if you ask me, we should do something about that.
maybe you can’t decide, if it’s enough (from a global perspective),
but you can decide, if it’s enough. just for you. so if you wanna startup and you wish to grow, we can only recommend to start your new life and drive the world forward.
it’s our culture that defines us, and so it defines our expansion and success over time.
for Romy Madley Croft.
If I scream at the top of my lungs, will you hear what I don’t say?
If I dance like I’m on a stage, will you see I seem out of place?
future 🌷. in a children’s tale. a novel. my novel.
automated machines, based on internet technology, shall answer all our questions. like an early prototype, called google. later, the cloud ⛅️ will solve optimization problems so complicated, that even Einstein’s brain could nevermore follow. 🚀⛅️🌍
Continue reading “future. and we’re heading directly towards.”
Hier der letzte Beitrag aus unserer “Interview”-Reihe mit @afelia, Marina Weisband.
3. Frage:
du hattest ja eben über die Bedeutung von Tablets und Smartphones gesprochen und den neuen Zugang, den diese Medien zur Welt der Software und Technologie erschaffen. Der Trend zu Tablets, also kleineren Strukturen und immer ergonomischen Lösungen wird ja weitergehen, die Welt bleibt ja nicht stehen. Also alles, was machbar ist, erst kommt die Werbung und es wird dann ja auch gekauft. Google Glass und diese Uhren namens iWatch sind vorangekündigt und es wird ein unglaublicher Hype ausgelöst um diese Themen.
View original post 418 more words
Very interesting thoughts about reaching a Consensus based on fairness so that everyone in a Team is willing to participate and work on or with the results, as they believe in the participation culture.
it’s rare for an inventor to meet people where you instantly see they have more or alternative thoughts to what you offer yourself, so finally, a true source of inspiration.
my personal recommendation.
While exploring governance in business over the past couple of years I encountered both Sociocracy and Holacracy. Both of these approaches to governance have been associated with self-directed groups, and both have wrongly been identified as forms of anarchy. I’ve read about these approaches, attended introductory workshops, and participated in discussion groups – but I don’t claim expertise (I’m not a trained facilitator in either Sociocracy or Holacracy). I have applied some of what I’ve learned in daily practice, particularly consent decision-making which I feel can lead to better and faster decisions.
What is Consent Decision-Making and Why Use It?
The basic idea behind consent decisions (aka formal consensus) is that the consent process splits-the-difference between autocratic decisions that are quickly mandated, and endless debate as can be encountered in group consensus decision-making:
View original post 525 more words
Der Buchladen.
Eine kleine Novelle der Zeit von Martin Bernhardt.
Kennen Sie das? – iPad. Irgendwann probieren Sie dann doch mal iBooks aus. Und auf einmal verstehen Sie – das ist genau wie mit der e-Mail und dem elektronischen Kalender: es ist super gemacht.
Der Untergang, er kommt mit leisen Schritten.
Aber wovon spreche ich denn da überhaupt?
Dynamic Applications 